Case Studies
Real examples of structured, evidence‑based genealogical verification for legal and corporate clients.
These anonymised case studies demonstrate how Tansom Heritage Group applies structured, PRINCE2‑aligned methodology to resolve identity conflicts, confirm statutory next of kin, and support defensible decision‑making for solicitors, pension providers, and estate administrators.
Identity Conflict Resolution — Sole Next of Kin Confirmed
A long‑running identity conflict created uncertainty over the lawful next of kin for an estate. A structured, evidence‑based search covering a 32‑year negative window resolved the discrepancy and confirmed the deceased’s brother as the sole NOK. This eliminated corporate liability and enabled the client to proceed with confidence.
Marital Status Verification — Surviving Spouse & Child Confirmed
Conflicting address and marriage information created doubt over the deceased’s lawful family relationships. A full audit of civil records identified two valid marriages, disproved two false ones, and confirmed the surviving spouse and daughter. This provided the client with a clear, defensible basis for estate distribution.
How Our Verification Workflow Operates
1
Scope & Research Plan
Define objectives and evidence requirements
2
Evidence Collection
Civil, electoral, parish, probate, and related records.
3
Structured Evidence Log
Positive, negative, and inconclusive findings recorded.
4
Analysis & Correlation
Cross‑checking identities and life‑course evidence.
5
Final Report
Clear, defensible conclusions and statutory NOK determination.
Identity Conflict Resolution — Sole Next of Kin Confirmed. Case Study: Pension Scheme Member Verification (Anonymised) Overview Tansom Heritage Group was instructed by a FTSE 100 Life & Pensions Provider to verify the life status of a former employee of a historic UK retail business. The provider required confirmation of identity, death, and statutory next of kin (NOK) to ensure correct administration of a deferred pension entitlement. The member was of advanced age and likely deceased. Incorrect NOK identification carried a risk of mis payment, administrative delay, and potential liability. Approach Working from verified internal data (date of birth, National Insurance number, last known address, and policy reference), the case was delivered using a structured, PRINCE2 aligned process. Research included: •civil registration searches •probate and wills •electoral registers •parish and burial records •negative evidence to confirm absence of marriage or children A potential identity conflict was identified early in the case, involving a similarly named individual in mid 20th century electoral registers. This was resolved through parish burial evidence and cross referencing civil sources. All findings were recorded in a formal Evidence Log, including positive, negative, and inconclusive searches. Key Findings •Identity confirmed through multiple independent civil sources •Death confirmed in the early 1980s •No marriage or children identified •Parents confirmed through civil and parish records •One full sibling identified, who survived the member by several decades •No competing NOK candidates Outcome The statutory next of kin was determined as the member’s elder full sibling. All conclusions were fully supported by evidence and delivered in a structured report with a complete Evidence Log. Impact The provider received: •clear NOK confirmation •resolution of an identity conflict •an audit ready evidence trail •confidence to proceed with pension administration This case demonstrates the value of structured genealogical verification in reducing risk for pension providers and trustees.
Marital Status Verification — Surviving Spouse & Child Confirmed. Case Study: Pension Scheme Member Verification (Anonymised) Overview Tansom Heritage Group was instructed by a FTSE 100 Life & Pensions Provider to resolve an identity conflict and confirm statutory next of kin (NOK) for a former employee of a historic UK retail business. The provider required certainty around identity, life status, and NOK before progressing a deferred pension entitlement. The case presented an immediate complication: the last known address for the member was occupied by an unrelated individual with the same name who denied any employment connection. This created an identity conflict that had to be resolved before any NOK determination could be made. Approach Working from verified internal data (date of birth, parental details, marriage information, and policy reference), the case was delivered using a structured, evidence led process. Research included: •civil registration records (birth, marriage, death) •electoral registers •parish and burial material •negative evidence to confirm absence of additional children •correlation of parental and life course evidence •a full Evidence Log documenting positive, negative, and inconclusive searches The identity conflict was resolved by matching date of birth, parental information, and life course evidence, ruling out the unrelated individual at the address. Key Findings •Correct identity confirmed •Death confirmed in the early 2020s •Two marriages identified •One child from the first marriage; none from the second •No probate issued •Surviving spouse from the second marriage confirmed as statutory NOK Outcome The statutory next of kin was determined as the surviving spouse from the second marriage. All findings were supported by a structured evidence trail and delivered in a clear, audit ready report. Impact The provider received: •resolution of an address based identity conflict •a clear NOK determination •reduced risk of mis payment •an evidence trail, suitable for internal audit and compliance •confidence to proceed with pension administration